We all do it – judge websites. But most people rely on their first
impression (see:
You’ll never get a second millisecond to make a first impression)
and can’t articulate the criteria that they are using to judge a site.
Some may indicate colour, photos, fonts and general layout. The savvier
user will mention ease-of-use and ability to find information. But in
general, people don’t have the words or experience to tell you what is
wrong with their site. They just know it sucks and isn’t working for
them.
Evaluation and benchmarking criteria for a good site
What are the best practices that make up a good evaluation?
According to “How visitors rate sites” by Larisa Thomason on
Netmechanic
here are some things to look for:
-
Images and Multimedia: dazzle but don’t annoy.
Photos should be real and, where possible, action oriented – they
should tell a story. Multimedia should have a purpose and should be
quick to load.And you should always have alternative information for
those who don’t want to go the multimedia route.>
Indeed, content is very important (see:
Intranet Design Melds to One) and so is planning – which is why
Prescient Digital Media double weights these categories when conducting
evaluations and site benchmarks. If you don’t have a plan, it often
manifests itself on the site in the form of poor information
architecture and usability. Intranets are especially known for getting
out of hand with multiple “micro-sites”, lack of standards and no
governance model. The poor person in charge of posting information
(yes, most don’t even have a qualified webmaster and some don’t even
have anyone with web responsibilities listed in their job
descriptions), is told to “just put it on the intranet” without
instructions as to placement, inter-linking, or archiving.
Consequently, the site is a hodgepodge of materials without a plan to
support and standardize what, where and how information is
available.
Aside from content and planning, Prescient also evaluates sites
based on look and feel, usability, layout, and tools and
innovation.
Some basic criteria we recommend:
- Content: needs to be current and frequently
updated to be considered trustworthy. It should be written for the web,
in scannable chunks with lots of headings to break up content – not
just print material that is posted.
- Planning: “most intranets in a mess lack a common
vision for what the intranet should be,” according to Jerry Stevenson
in “Taming a Chaotic Intranet” in an item posted with IABC. Does the site have a mission,
vision and goals? Are content owners identified? Is there a governance
model? Are metrics being recorded and analyzed?
-
Look and Feel: consistency is vital – set and
follow standards and guidelines. If you find microsites popping up
using every colour scheme imaginable, your site loses
credibility.
-
Usability: all sites should have a sitemap,
breadcrumbs (path trail), a good search engine and a taxonomy that
works with your audience. Avoid using acronyms and non-descriptive
words that don’t tell the user what content can be found under that
category.
-
Layout: scrolling should be kept to a minimum and
white space should be part of the design, not an indicator that you ran
out of content.
-
Tools and Innovation: can people do what they
need to do? A good search engine that provides forgiveness for
misspelling is one standard tool. Consider collaboration tools like
wikis, communication innovations like blogs, and applications like
calculators. Make sure that if a page is likely to be printed, it
prints well or has an alternate format. And if you have online forms
make them easy – the best are forms that can be completed and submitted
online. It is not innovative to make people print a form, fill it out
in ink, and then send it somewhere.
Once you evaluate your own site and give it a score, you should do
the same to about four other competitive sites. Granted, it is
difficult to benchmark against other intranet sites, which is why it is
best left to professionals who have the expertise and relationships to
get permission to look at intranets for various organizations. But you
should still be able to evaluate your site with best practices.
Best practices are good ideas that work: when you see a good idea
put it to use on your site and track it to make sure it works for you.
You should evaluate your site on a regular basis; after all it is a
work in progress and should be continually updated to meet the changing
needs of your organization. Don’t leave your evaluation to phrases like
“it sucks” it might be easier to improve then you think.
Prescient Digital Media is a
veteran web and intranet consulting firm with 10+ years of rich history.
We provide strategic Internet and intranet
consulting, planning and communications services to many Fortune 500 and
big brand clients, as well as small and medium-sized leaders.